Part of it is the fascination with the Occupy movement. I’ve actually caught myself referring to it as “the movement” in a non-ironic way, like some relic of 1969, which is kinda scary – those without a sense of irony tending to be the eye gougingly dull ideologues we love to hate. But the fact remains – I’m fascinated by the tenacity, by the growing sense of mass, by the potential for change that seems to surround this nascent movement.
Part of it is also a growing recognition of the value of disorder. Working in government, where we try to manage risk and develop structures to withstand all manner of market chaos, this has not been something that has come easily. But increasingly, there it is – chaos is essential in the healthy functioning of a real democracy.
Put it another way: Fuck the Marxists who believe in freeing us all by first subjecting us to a preliminary dictatorship….which, of course, never ends. Fuck the devotees of capital who want to wrestle our democracy and civic society into subservience to the market. Basically – fuck the utopians. These are the fundamentalists, the ones without a sense of irony, who want to create a world where everything runs smoothly, everything is shiny and everyone thinks like them.
Boooooooooooooring. People with no sense of irony are unable to perceive the absurdly obvious flaws of their own perfect world views. What they are able to do is perceive anyone who doesn’t share their broken view of the world as utterly irrational and beyond redemption. Easier to purge or bash by cop that way…
Nah, paint me black and white and spank my Hegel, but I love a good dialectic!! It’s only through the opposition of different ideas that the majority tend to benefit. Adoption of extreme modes of political and economic theory all too readily turn into just another form of slavery, and that just makes me grumpy. It’s only through constant conflict, the playing out of opposing memes, powers and interest groups in the public domain that stable and effective modes of governance and economics emerge.
So, I’m starting a new movement – I’m a radical centrist. Like a chubby patrician, I bathe unashamedly in the self-contradictory absurdism of my movement’s name. I resolutely sit on the fence and have a bet each way. I refuse to join, but sit making snide comments at the earnestness of others. I let the extremists slog it out, exhaust each others idiocy, and benefit in the better world that results. Play ‘em off against each other and the rest of us will be better off.
In terms of what’s happening on Wall Street and at all the other places where the citizenry dares to exercise its right to free assembly, I can only hope that they continue to resolutely reject any kind of political coherence or adherence to any ideology. Bless you unruly mob, but as soon as you replace your genuine discontent with formulae, you will lose. Cos by doing that, you would allow your enemies to paint you into a corner, marginalise you, and pretend this shit never happened.

Where do I sign up? Or can I just wait to see how many other people don't join before I commit? If there are too many of us we might be accused of having a hardline ideology and thus lose our status as fence sitters :)
ReplyDeletePerhaps it's not so much that we are living in interesting times, but that the times immediately before now have been so dull, eg two party systems, corporatisation, the growth of bureaucracy and the homogenising effect of globalisation.
The (re)-emergence of a more dialectic political landscape (thanks in part to Occupy) may make our times seem more interesting, but really (and getting all Copernican on your arse) it's just another small manifestation of human social/political progress which continues regardless of the type of ideology (no disrespect to the Movement). Being only human-sized when you have over 10 years of a dry and dusty political landscape, you don't see the change and flux that is the constant of our history. But on a macro scale, human society has always been pushed forward (or back) by chaos, it is the primordial soup of human social evolution. So ultimately, radical centrism is both the most conservative and the most open position you can take. This is ironic, so we must be on the right track. (I was being ironic) Ha! OK I'll stop.