My wife is a better sort of person than me, which is probably why I like her. Last night she came home from attending a meeting of unions, social workers, nurses, priests, not-for profits, charities and all other manner of people who work to help the disadvantaged of Sydney. The Sydney Alliance, according to its website, “brings together diverse community organisations, unions and religious organisations to advance the common good and achieve a fair, just and sustainable city.”
So my wife came home full of enthusiasm for the sense of community that was built at this meeting, and talked about the young Lebanese boy who spoke about a world where he and his mates could get together and hang out, without being hassled by cops. I was prepping some veggies for dinner at the time and so was a little distracted - she quite rightly stopped and said ”what’s that look on your face supposed to mean?”
What indeed? A whole range of preconceptions was running through my head. “Yeah well there’s probably a reason the cops hassle him and his mates, this kind of thing doesn’t just come out of nowhere.” Or “well, honestly, if I saw a bunch of pumped up, yahooing young blokes coming down the street toward me, I’d probably cross to the other side of the road.” (Shit, I sound like an Alan Jones caller).
Anyway, the animated discussion that followed basically boiled down to me taking the “personal responsibility” line, versus she on the “community engagement and positive action” argument. You know how that one goes and I’m not going to repeat it here. But what struck me most about the discussion was the underlying sense of forgiveness, openness and, let’s be blunt, love that seems to be the motivation of the people who take part in things like the Sydney Alliance. While I ranted about how “I don’t care how disadvantaged you have been, once you pick up a weapon and you hurt me, or anyone I care about, I will try to end you”, my wife insisted that the only true way to make things better, to stop the kinds of things I was talking about, was to engage and build. Basically, to forgive. She repeated the story told at the Alliance meeting of a lady who had been stabbed in the eye while filling up her car at a petrol station, and who had talked about how she had come to forgive her attackers. I shook my head incredulously – I would never do that. My instinct would be to pursue anyone who did that to me, through whatever means were open to me, and seek to ruin them. Eye for an eye, literally.
The Sydney Alliance consists of all sorts, including members of a whole range of Christian denominations. But, there were also a massive number of non-Christians as well, including representatives from Muslim faiths, unions, and my wife herself, who has grown up in an atheist/agnostic household. It struck me that it is people like this who are the real Christians, the ones who are actually working through what Jesus taught. It’s such a juxtaposition from the hatred, exclusion and judgemental attitude of most politicised Christians, or the “religious right” as they have come to be called.
Anyway, all that this made me realise was that I am not a Christian, nor a particularly “progressive” member of society. I should probably hand in my theoretical “lefty” membership card. I have never forgiven those who wronged me, and I’ll never forget. I don’t think I really can let go of my anger enough to actually embrace that particular ideology. But I admire those who can. I just hope that there are more people like my wife than me out there, otherwise we’re all fucked.

Hi Christian,
ReplyDeleteGood post. I've thought a lot about that split between ideology of the (now largely fictional) Left and Right:
The Left say that it is society that is generating these issues, via creating the circumstances in which they arise, meaning that we need to look at the causes of these problems and address them, while also creating a safety net (via social security, quality public services, etc) to ensure that those society disadvantages have every opportunity possible.
The Right say its all down to choice, these people have chosen to do these things, despite all the nanny state provisions in place (you can probably tell which side I'm on here), and so we should punish them.
The Right is a much simpler argument, which is probably why it appeals to people as they get older, their brains start to atrophy - things weren't like this when they was a kid - and they can no longer handle change quite as easily, etc.
There's also two kinds of people, in my view, who rise out of that societal mass of disadvantage: those who think "wow, how fortunate am I to have got to where I am considering my background, and the amount of people of similar backgrounds who are still kind of where they were - I should help more people achieve more".
The other group thinks "I got out because I worked hard, everyone else who didn't is lazy and choosing to be like that. They should work harder and be like me".
Of course I'm generalising wildly in this rant...
I would say compassion is the key, as it's what drives forgiveness.
Mark
Hey guys... good points left, right and center.
ReplyDeleteIf I may add some of my personal views and life experience.
I think in the end it all comes down to expectancy and its vicious circle!
I do agree we all should help the people in need, but in most of the cases once you are being helped there is no incentive for you to grow and stop being helped.
I might be stepping into a mine field but let's just highlight the case of Lebanese boy. Instead of dreaming of a world where cops would leave you alone why not take a proactive measure and start thinking what you should do to stop being hassled by cops. Walking in smaller groups and making less noise always helped me through my youth years.
I know it have been said many times before, but education and hard work go a long way in keeping you distant from welfare.
I'm not a big fan of welfare, or at least not the one where they give you clean cash. Providing free education and making you work towards something are the ways it should be.
I like one particular project in Sao Paulo regarding housing welfare. Instead of the government paying for your accommodation and hoping that one day you will have a job and move on, they make you build your own house.
They will provide land and building materials but if you wanna a place to call home you have to actively help to build it.
By making you part of the process, you have a sense of ownership, making you proud of your achievements. And what just happened? In the process of building your home you got a qualification and now can make a living working in the building industry. Voila!
Anyway, don't be expectant of society and government and you shall be fine!
Fabio
mate, something really bothered me about this piece you've written and i think its this:
ReplyDeleteyou describe your attitude with such a certain finality. you are angry and unforgiving and will always be like that.
this is a type of conservatism that frightens me. in reality you could have any number of transformative experiences that cause you to change your attitudes and opinions. to be convinced that the way you feel now is the way you will always be and to say, as you do at the end, that the only way forward for humanity is if other people can do a better job seems to be abdicating the 'personal responsibility' you claimed to believe in.
our attitudes arent just things that mysteriously fall in our laps. compassion (or whatever it was you admire about the people in the group you wrote about) is a quality that can be cultivated. i think you only have to hand in your progressive membership card if you think you're done progressing.
Vince